Infographic: Cognitive Debiasing Stress Test

The Cognitive Debiasing Stress Test

How to outsmart your own thinking patterns and make better decisions, based on the research of Kahneman, Tversky, and Ariely.

Phase 1

Auditing Your Intuition (System 1)

Our brains love simple stories and quick judgments. This first step uncovers the unconscious shortcuts that shape your initial assessment.

📖

Narrative Heuristic

We construct plausible stories to make sense of the world. Ask yourself: What story am I telling myself right now that makes this decision feel right?

💡

Availability Heuristic

We overestimate the likelihood of events that come easily to mind. Is your decision based on vivid anecdotes or statistical facts?

Anchoring Effect

The first piece of information we receive influences all subsequent judgments. What "anchor" (e.g., a price, a salary) might be unconsciously distorting your thinking?

🧠

Cognitive Load

Stress, time pressure, and information overload force us to use mental shortcuts. How high is your current mental load? Are you able to think analytically?

Phase 2

Breaking the Frame

We often only see what's directly in front of us (WYSIATI - What You See Is All There Is). This phase forces you to look beyond the obvious.

The Framing Effect

The same information, presented differently, leads to different decisions. A 90% success chance feels better than a 10% failure chance.

The Relativity Trap

We compare options relative to each other. A "decoy" option can make another option seem more attractive than it actually is.

Phase 3

Active Disconfirmation

Actively combat Confirmation Bias by deliberately seeking counter-evidence and weaknesses.

The Premortem Technique (Gary Klein)

Imagine your decision led to a disaster. How could that have happened? This process uncovers risks you might otherwise overlook.

📅

Today

Decision

💥

In 1 Year

Disaster

🔍

Analysis

Why?

😈

Play Devil's Advocate

Formulate the strongest, most passionate argument *against* your own decision. What are the most compelling counter-arguments?

🗣️

Seek Dissent

Find the most intelligent person who disagrees with you. Truly listen to their arguments, rather than just waiting for your turn to speak.

Phase 4

Uncovering Hidden Drivers

Often, it's not rational but emotional and social forces that guide our decisions.

The Sunk Cost Fallacy

Are you justifying continuing a path simply because you've already invested time and money?

Identity Signaling

What image of yourself are you projecting with this decision? How much of it is pure self-presentation?

Phase 5

Synthesis & Recalibration

Consolidate your insights and formulate a more robust, well-considered decision.

Confidence Check

How confident were you before this process – and how confident are you now? The difference shows the value of reflection.

🎯

The Refined Decision

Reformulate your decision. It might remain the same, but now you know the risks and can plan countermeasures. For example: "I will do X and mitigate risk Y (identified in the premortem) by implementing Z."

Phase 6

Generating Alternative Scenarios

Leverage the insights from all previous phases to actively brainstorm and evaluate truly diverse alternative courses of action. Don't just refine; innovate.

Brainstorming Beyond the Obvious

Based on the biases you've identified, the frames you've broken, the counter-arguments you've considered, and the hidden drivers you've uncovered, what entirely new options or approaches emerge?

  • **The "Opposite" Scenario:** What if you did the exact opposite of your initial preliminary decision? What would that look like, and what are its potential benefits/drawbacks?
  • **The "Minimalist" Scenario:** What is the absolute least you could do to address the core problem or seize the core opportunity?
  • **The "Maximalist" Scenario:** What is the most ambitious or resource-intensive approach you could take?
  • **The "External Expert" Scenario:** If an unbiased, highly knowledgeable external expert were to propose a solution, what might it be?
  • **The "Long-Term Play" Scenario:** What decision would you make if you were optimizing purely for a 5-10 year outlook, ignoring short-term pressures?

Evaluate these new scenarios against the refined decision from Phase 5. This ensures you're not just correcting for bias, but actively exploring a broader solution space.

Structured reflection is the key to better decisions.